Evolution of Coaching Role will Cause Casualties
The modern day Rugby League coach is ever increasingly in the spotlight. From post match media interviews trying to explain on field results to weekly interviews for radio or news crews.
While this might seem daunting, and I am sure it would be for most - some coaches are able to use this as a positive for their club and their personal careers.
Certain coaches have used this time to build pressure on referees by mentioning something the whistle blower 'is' or 'is not' doing - this generally happenes before important games, where coaches will mention every illegal tactic next weeks opponent has been using - in the hope they can influence the referee to their teams advantage.
Not only has media attention increased on coaches, their role has now become more of an overall unit manager. The appearance of conditioning coaches, backs coaches, forwards coaches and assistant coaches has elevated the coach into a role of a conductor. Where as in years gone by, a coach would spent hours on the training paddock with his team, with many new assistants these days - a head coach will spend more time studying opposition weaknesses in video sessions and planning the assault plan for the weekend ahead.
This evolution has allowed NRL clubs to improve dramatically, while some coaches have adapted and flourished under this new style - some coaches find it hard to deal with the constant media commitments and the daily man management regime. These coaches find it hard to don the suit and tie for game day and are much more at home in a tracksuit chomping on a pie during the big game.


With the Dragons squad losing many stars at the end of 2006 and Brown having spent many years in the job - Brown had better catch the fast train to finishing school or risk catching the all stations to centrelink.